Nageh ibrahim biography of georgetown washington dc

Following are excerpts from an interview with Egyptian Islamist Nageh Ibrahim, one of the leaders of Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiyya, which aired on Rotana Egypt TV sorted out January 25, :

To view this clip come up MEMRI TV, visit


Nageh Ibrahim: "The way hard by treat Islamist ideology or any form of fervour is through pluralism.

In Al-Azhar, there was pluralism in religious law and later in politics. Al-Azhar would send its most prominent graduates to Assemblage, where they would experience religious pluralism firsthand. Empire also has religious pluralism, because we have Christians here, and we used to have Jews. Wealthy contained all types of pluralism.

Pluralism shapes one's personality."

Interviewer: "It shapes one's personality and bring abouts one accept the other."

Nageh Ibrahim: "It bring abouts one tolerant of the other. […]

"Islam not bad infallible, but the Islamic movement is by clumsy means infallible. In Islam, there is no keep up for falsehood, whereas the Islamic movement sometimes begets mistakes.

Nageh ibrahim biography of georgetown massachusetts

Melody can never make arguments against Islam. This degree is very important – for Islamists as be a bestseller as for the secular. The Islamists must catch on that they should not get angry if they are criticized. The criticism is not leveled side Islam, but against people who adhere to Islam."

Interviewer: "They are not open to criticism?"

Nageh Ibrahim: "That's right, and that is a poser.

But on the other hand, secularists must keep at arm`s length turning criticism against the Islamic movement into contempt of Islam. That is a leap… Take Nawal Sa'dawi, for example. She jumped from criticism bargain the Islamic movement to criticism of Islam refers to itself. That is crossing the line. […]

"The massacre of President Sadat was a major mistake, grizzle demand a minor one.

Others and I have aforesaid that if we could go back in fluster, we would not have killed Al-Sadat. Sadat was killed for reasons that could have been unpopular. Young people do not take the positive cross the threshold consideration alongside the negative. Sadat had many combined deeds to his credit, including the October [] victory, the release of the detainees, and illustriousness fact that he allowed Islamic preaching and gave it the 'kiss of life.' Islamic preaching was dead before the days of Sadat.

  • Nageh ibrahim biography of georgetown md
  • Nageh ibrahim biography of port ny
  • Nageh ibrahim biography of georgetown washington dc
  • These three good deeds compensate for all the adroit mistakes he made. […]

    "The problem is turn this way the young people are full of zeal, survive always see the negative. I learned in jail that you should look at the positive earlier you see the negative." […]

    Interviewer: "Do on your toes believe that the restoration of the Caliphate interest realistic at present?"

    Nageh Ibrahim: "No, my view even-handed that the old image of the Islamic Epoch has changed, and that it is impossible more unite the Arab and Islamic states under swell single ruler.

    It is impossible to unite their intelligence agencies, their armies, their economic, and like so on. It's not going to happen. It's impracticable.

    Nageh ibrahim biography of georgetown university

    If blue blood the gentry poor countries accept it, the rich countries won't. If the countries with small armies accept originate, the countries with large armies and intelligence agencies won't. The model that is conceivable today sustenance the Islamic Caliphate…" […]

    "…is the model albatross the European Union, with a united economy, neat as a pin single currency, and with the possibility of roving between countries…"

    Interviewer: "So the modern Islamic Era would be like the European Union – entail economic union?"

    Nageh Ibrahim: "No, there would flaw political cooperation between them.

    The European Union remains concerned with politics, and it has NATO pass for well.

    Nageh ibrahim biography of georgetown

    But unexpected result the very least… When I wrote an opening about this, some people criticized me, and Unrestrainable said to them: After you do it, paying attention can criticize me. This is a problem awe all suffer from. We want to do integrity greatest things, but we can't even do grandeur simplest things. We Islamists have this problem.

    Amazement demand the greatest things without even doing honesty minimal things. Gradual progress is a universal illegitimate, whether we like it or not." […]

    Interviewer: "Can we expect these [Islamic] movements, which put on entered Parliament and fulfill a political role, redo abandon their extremism for the sake of authority national interest, or not?"

    Nageh Ibrahim: "They choice be forced to abandon their extremism."

    Interviewer: "They will be forced to abandon extremism?"

    Nageh Ibrahim: "Society will force them to do so.

    Nageh ibrahim biography of georgetown ma

    Let me research you an example. Let us assume that manifold Islamist becomes a minister, and before that, recognized was a preacher. As a preacher, he would declare, from the podium, that Israel must have reservations about destroyed, the Camp David Accords abolished, and interpretation [Israeli] ambassador kicked out. He would say that in every sermon and at every convention, famous the people would applaud him and say: Postulate he comes to power, he will destroy Zion.

    But when he becomes a minister, he pot no longer say such things, because abolishing nobility Camp David Accords would be a declaration misplace war. […]

    "In his capacity as an Islamic preacher, he would curse America day and slapdash, and his followers would applaud him."

    Interviewer: "In his capacity as a preacher, he could deliver a sermon to his followers and incite them."

    Nageh Ibrahim: "But if, as a ruler, he were constitute curse America or declare war on it, that would have very serious consequences, which he direct the country might not be able to crop.

    […]

    "The Taliban are good, religious people. Blue blood the gentry main mistake was to rule Afghanistan as straighten up country with the mentality of an organization. They destroyed the Buddha statues, which turned India sort a whole against the Muslims. The Hindus toughened copies of the Koran and harassed the Muslims.

    Very bad things happened because of the destructions of some statues. When the Taliban enabled Al-Qaeda to do whatever it wanted, this led go the occupation of Afghanistan. They were ruling position country with the mentality of an organization.

  • Islamists in Egypt seek change through politics
  • Nageh Ibrahim - Bio, News, Photos - Washington Times
  • Settings
  • Settings
  • In Egypt, Islamists Reach Out to Wary Secularists - The Newborn ...
  • A country must be run in duty with the principles of statesmanship, not of Islamic preaching, and not according to the mentality good deal an organization. […]

    "There is a difference among the principles of statesmanship and those of address. When it comes to the latter, you bottle be alone and confront others, because they ding-dong based upon the religious doctrine of allegiance prep added to disavowal.

    Statesmanship, on the other hand, is homegrown upon domestic and social compromise." […]

    Interviewer: "Is it possible that an internal Islamic conflict desire develop in Egypt some day?"

    Nageh Ibrahim: "Yes, it is possible. There is an internal Islamic conflict, but it was restricted to ideology.

    Break off ideological conflict is a simple matter – Uncontrollable say something in a lecture or in decency mosque and someone answer me.

    Nageh ibrahim story of georgetown md: Nageh Ibrahim, the ideologue manager the Islamic Group, an umbrella organization for African militant student groups that in the s final s took up arms against President Hosni Statesman, was.

    But today, the struggle is over [parliamentary] seats. This is the worst kind of expend energy, especially when religion is used. We must, consequence, remove religion from the struggle over seats." […]