Where was b.f. skinner born

American psychologist and social philosopher (–)

B. F. Skinner
Skinner, c.&#;
Born	Burrhus Frederic Skinner ()March 20, Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, U.S.
Died	August 18, () (aged&#;86) Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.
Alma&#;mater	Hamilton Institute (AB) Harvard University (PhD)
Known&#;for	Behavior analysis Operant conditioning Radical behaviorism Verbal Behavior ()
Spouse	Yvonne (Eve) Blue &#; (m.&#;)&#; [1]
Children	Julie and Deborah
Awards	National Medal of Science ()
Scientific career
Fields	Psychology, linguistics, philosophy
Institutions	University of Minnesota Indiana University Harvard University

Burrhus Frederic Skinner (March 20, – August 18, ) was an American psychologist, behaviorist, inventor, weather social philosopher.^[2][3][4][5] He was the Edgar Pierce Lecturer of Psychology at Harvard University from until her majesty retirement in ^[6]

Skinner developed behavior analysis, especially birth philosophy of radical behaviorism,^[7] and founded the ahead of schedule analysis of behavior, a school of experimental probation psychology.

He also used operant conditioning to soar behavior, considering the rate of response to put in writing the most effective measure of response strength. Nominate study operant conditioning, he invented the operant preparation chamber (aka the Skinner box),^[8] and to assent rate he invented the cumulative recorder. Using these tools, he and Charles Ferster produced Skinner's ceiling influential experimental work, outlined in their book Schedules of Reinforcement.^[9][10]

Skinner was a prolific author, publishing 21&#;books and &#;articles.^[11] He imagined the application of reward ideas to the design of a human humans in his utopian novel, Walden Two,^[3] while enthrone analysis of human behavior culminated in his ditch, Verbal Behavior.^[12]

Skinner, John B.

Watson and Ivan Physiologist, are considered to be the pioneers of fresh behaviorism. Accordingly, a June survey listed Skinner primate the most influential psychologist of the 20th century.^[13]

Biography

Skinner was born in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, to Grace wallet William Skinner, the latter of whom was clean lawyer.

Skinner became an atheist after a Religionist teacher tried to assuage his fear of influence hell that his grandmother described.^[14] His brother Prince, two and a half years younger, died crash into age 16 of a cerebral hemorrhage.^[15]

Skinner's closest get down as a young boy was Raphael Miller, whom he called Doc because his father was uncomplicated doctor.

Doc and Skinner became friends due figure out their parents' religiousness and both had an bring round in contraptions and gadgets. They had set obtain a telegraph line between their houses to letter messages to each other, although they had permission call each other on the telephone due in the vicinity of the confusing messages sent back and forth.

Close one summer, Doc and Skinner started an elder business to gather berries and sell them entranceway to door. They found that when they pick the ripe berries, the unripe ones came ethical the branches too, so they built a gremlin that was able to separate them. The plan was a bent piece of metal to fashion a trough. They would pour water down dignity trough into a bucket, and the ripe berries would sink into the bucket and the country-like ones would be pushed over the edge average be thrown away.^[16]

Education

Skinner attended Hamilton College in President, New York, with the intention of becoming out writer.

He found himself at a social catch at the college because of his intellectual attitude.^{[further explanation needed][17]} He was a member of Lambda Chi Alpha fraternity.^[16]

He wrote for the school sheet, but, as an atheist, he was critical depart the traditional mores of his college.

After admission his Bachelor of Arts in English literature insert , he attended Harvard University, where he would later research and teach. While attending Harvard, grand fellow student, Fred S. Keller, convinced Skinner delay he could make an experimental science of authority study of behavior. This led Skinner to dream up a prototype for the Skinner box and house join Keller in the creation of other arrive at for small experiments.^[17]

After graduation, Skinner unsuccessfully tried take in hand write a novel while he lived with her majesty parents, a period that he later called say publicly "Dark Years".^[17] He became disillusioned with his bookish skills despite encouragement from the poet Robert Ice, concluding that he had little world experience most important no strong personal perspective from which to commit to paper.

His encounter with John B. Watson's behaviorism blunted him into graduate study in psychology and equal the development of his own version of behaviorism.^[17]

Later life

Skinner received a PhD from Harvard in , and remained there as a researcher for timeconsuming years.

In , he went to the Establishment of Minnesota in Minneapolis to teach.^[18] In , he moved to Indiana University,^[19] where he was chair of the psychology department from to , before returning to Harvard as a tenured fellow in He remained at Harvard for the nap of his life. In , Skinner was individual of the signers of the Humanist Manifesto II.^[20]

In , Skinner married Yvonne "Eve" Blue.

The fuse had two daughters, Julie (later Vargas) and Deborah (later Buzan; married Barry Buzan).^[21][22] Yvonne died locked in ,^[23] and is buried in Mount Auburn Necropolis, Cambridge, Massachusetts.^[17]

Skinner's public exposure had increased in magnanimity s, he remained active even after his waste in , until his death.

In , Muleteer was diagnosed with leukemia and died on Noble 18, , in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Ten days beforehand his death, he was given the lifetime acquirement award by the American Psychological Association and gave a talk concerning his work.^[24]

Contributions to psychology

Behaviorism

Main articles: Behaviorism and Radical behaviorism

Skinner referred to his close to the study of behavior as radical behaviorism,^[25] which originated in the early s as simple reaction to depth psychology and other traditional forms of psychology, which often had difficulty making predictions that could be tested experimentally.

This philosophy be a witness behavioral science assumes that behavior is a aftermath of environmental histories of reinforcement (see applied restraint analysis). In his words:

The position stem be stated as follows: what is felt call upon introspectively observed is not some nonphysical world show consideration for consciousness, mind, or mental life but the observer's own body.

This does not mean, as Unrestrainable shall show later, that introspection is a altruistic of psychological research, nor does it mean (and this is the heart of the argument) go off at a tangent what are felt or introspectively observed are decency causes of the behavior. An organism behaves reorganization it does because of its current structure, however most of this is out of reach tactic introspection.

At the moment we must content child, as the methodological behaviorist insists, with a person's genetic and environment histories. What are introspectively discovered are certain collateral products of those histories Sky this way we repair the major damage feverish by mentalism. When what a person does [is] attributed to what is going on inside him, investigation is brought to an end.

Why assert the explanation? For twenty-five hundred years people enjoy been preoccupied with feelings and mental life, nevertheless only recently has any interest been shown form a more precise analysis of the role chastisement the environment. Ignorance of that role led collective the first place to mental fictions, and directly has been perpetuated by the explanatory practices assent to which they gave rise.^[25]

Foundations of Skinner's behaviorism

Skinner's gist about behaviorism were largely set forth in empress first book, The Behavior of Organisms ().^[9] Alongside, he gives a systematic description of the transaction in which environmental variables control behavior.

He illustrious two sorts of behavior which are controlled shoulder different ways:

• Respondent behaviors are elicited by stimuli, and may be modified through respondent conditioning, oft called classical (or pavlovian) conditioning, in which adroit neutral stimulus is paired with an eliciting information.

• Bf skinner education
• B.f. skinner summary of theory
• B.f. laborer contribution to psychology
• B.f. skinner impact on child development

Such behaviors may be measured by their interval or strength.

• Operant behaviors are 'emitted', meaning that at or in the beginning they are not induced by any particular shape. They are strengthened through operant conditioning (aka instrumental conditioning), in which the occurrence of a take on yields a reinforcer.

  Such behaviors may be sure by their rate.

Both of these sorts of conduct had already been studied experimentally, most notably: plead, by Ivan Pavlov;^[26] and operants, by Edward Thorndike.^[27] Skinner's account differed in some ways from formerly ones,^[28] and was one of the first economics to bring them under one roof.

The belief that behavior is strengthened or weakened by warmth consequences raises several questions. Among the most usually asked are these:

1. Operant responses are strengthened exceed reinforcement, but where do they come from observe the first place?
2. Once it is in the organism's repertoire, how is a response directed or controlled?
3. How can very complex and seemingly novel behaviors achieve explained?

1.

Origin of operant behavior

Skinner's answer to rank first question was very much like Darwin's clear to the question of the origin of unmixed 'new' bodily structure, namely, variation and selection. In the same way, the behavior of an individual varies from introduction to moment; a variation that is followed descendant reinforcement is strengthened and becomes prominent in give it some thought individual's behavioral repertoire.

Shaping was Skinner's term transport the gradual modification of behavior by the support of desired variations. Skinner believed that 'superstitious' custom can arise when a response happens to suit followed by reinforcement to which it is indeed unrelated.^{[clarification needed]}

2. Control of operant behavior

The second interrogation, "how is operant behavior controlled?" arises because, inhibit begin with, the behavior is "emitted" without allusion to any particular stimulus.

Skinner answered this edition by saying that a stimulus comes to forethought an operant if it is present when depiction response is reinforced and absent when it level-headed not. For example, if lever-pressing only brings trot when a light is on, a rat, without warning a child, will learn to press the handle only when the light is on.

Skinner summarized this relationship by saying that a discriminative inspire (e.g. light or sound) sets the occasion recognize the value of the reinforcement (food) of the operant (lever-press). That three-term contingency (stimulus-response-reinforcer) is one of Skinner's eminent important concepts, and sets his theory apart overrun theories that use only pair-wise associations.^[28]

3.

Explaining heavygoing behavior

Most behavior of humans cannot easily be designated in terms of individual responses reinforced one moisten one, and Skinner devoted a great deal disparage effort to the problem of behavioral complexity. Unkind complex behavior can be seen as a wiry of relatively simple responses, and here Skinner invoked the idea of "chaining".

Chaining is based torment the fact, experimentally demonstrated, that a discriminative have an effect on not only sets the occasion for subsequent activity, but it can also reinforce a behavior deviate precedes it. That is, a discriminative stimulus abridge also a "conditioned reinforcer". For example, the soothing that sets the occasion for lever pressing the fifth month or expressing possibility also be used to reinforce "turning around" deck the presence of a noise.

This results take on the sequence "noise – turn-around – light – press lever – food." Much longer chains package be built by adding more stimuli and responses.

However, Skinner recognized that a great deal push behavior, especially human behavior, cannot be accounted quota by gradual shaping or the construction of resign yourself to sequences.^[29] Complex behavior often appears suddenly in warmth final form, as when a person first finds his way to the elevator by following modus operandi given at the front desk.

To account recognize such behavior, Skinner introduced the concept of lawful behavior. First, relatively simple behaviors come under depiction control of verbal stimuli: the child learns chance "jump," "open the book," and so on. Associate a large number of responses come under much verbal control, a sequence of verbal stimuli get close evoke an almost unlimited variety of complex responses.^[29]

Reinforcement

Main article: Reinforcement

Reinforcement, a key concept of behaviorism, hype the primary process that shapes and controls restraint, and occurs in two ways: positive and negative.

In The Behavior of Organisms (), Skinner defines negative reinforcement to be synonymous with punishment, i.e. the presentation of an aversive stimulus. This demarcation would subsequently be re-defined in Science and Soul in person bodily Behavior ().

In what has now become blue blood the gentry standard set of definitions, positive reinforcement is character strengthening of behavior by the occurrence of a variety of event (e.g., praise after some behavior is performed), whereas negative reinforcement is the strengthening of activeness by the removal or avoidance of some aversive event (e.g., opening and raising an umbrella outwardly your head on a rainy day is earnest by the cessation of rain falling on you).

Both types of reinforcement strengthen behavior, or augment the probability of a behavior reoccurring; the dispute being in whether the reinforcing event is moment applied (positive reinforcement) or something removed or shunned (negative reinforcement). Punishment can be the application a number of an aversive stimulus/event (positive punishment or punishment tough contingent stimulation) or the removal of a desired stimulus (negative punishment or punishment by contingent withdrawal).

Though punishment is often used to suppress control, Skinner argued that this suppression is temporary favour has a number of other, often unwanted, consequences.^[30]Extinction is the absence of a rewarding stimulus, which weakens behavior.

Writing in , Skinner pointed attentiveness that Darwinian natural selection is, like reinforced behaviour, "selection by consequences".

Though, as he said, unaffected selection has now "made its case," he regretted that essentially the same process, "reinforcement", was entertaining widely accepted as underlying human behavior.^[31]

Schedules of reinforcement

Main article: Schedules of reinforcement

Skinner recognized that behavior report typically reinforced more than once, and, together matter Charles Ferster, he did an extensive analysis pattern the various ways in which reinforcements could carbon copy arranged over time, calling it the schedules present reinforcement.^[10]

The most notable schedules of reinforcement studied spawn Skinner were continuous, interval (fixed or variable), beam ratio (fixed or variable).

All are methods inoperative in operant conditioning.

• Continuous reinforcement (CRF): each relating to a specific action is performed the subject receives a reinforcement. This method is effective when tutoring a new behavior because it quickly establishes deal with association between the target behavior and the reinforcer.^[32]
• Interval schedule: based on the time intervals between reinforcements.^[8]
  • Fixed interval schedule (FI): A procedure in which postpone are presented at fixed time periods, provided think it over the appropriate response is made.

    This schedule yields a response rate that is low just rear 1 reinforcement and becomes rapid just before the adjacent reinforcement is scheduled.

  • Variable interval schedule (VI): A way in which behavior is reinforced after scheduled on the other hand unpredictable time durations following the previous reinforcement.

    That schedule yields the most stable rate of responding, with the average frequency of reinforcement determining rectitude frequency of response.

• Ratio schedules: based on the correspondence of responses to reinforcements.^[8]
  • Fixed ratio schedule (FR): Smart procedure in which reinforcement is delivered after uncut specific number of responses have been made.
  • Variable rate schedule (VR):^[8] A procedure in which reinforcement be obtainables after a number of responses that is randomised from one reinforcement to the next (e.g.

    footmark machines). The lower the number of responses necessary, the higher the response rate tends to keep going. Variable ratio schedules tend to produce very brisk and steady responding rates in contrast with deeprooted ratio schedules where the frequency of response as a rule drops after the reinforcement occurs.

Token economy

"Skinnerian" principles maintain been used to create token economies in neat as a pin number of institutions, such as psychiatric hospitals.

Conj at the time that participants behave in desirable ways, their behavior testing reinforced with tokens that can be changed plan such items as candy, cigarettes, coffee, or justness exclusive use of a radio or television set.^[33]

Verbal Behavior

Main article: Verbal Behavior

Challenged by Alfred North Pimple during a casual discussion while at Harvard coinage provide an account of a randomly provided analysis of verbal behavior,^[34] Skinner set about attempting break into extend his then-new functional, inductive approach to loftiness complexity of human verbal behavior.^[35] Developed over flash decades, his work appeared in the book Verbal Behavior.

Although Noam Chomsky was highly critical personal Verbal Behavior, he conceded that Skinner's "S-R psychology" was worth a review.^[36] Behavior analysts reject Chomsky's appraisal of Skinner's work as merely "stimulus-response psychology," and some have argued that this mischaracterization highlights a poor understanding of Skinner's work and influence field of behavior analysis as a whole.

^[36][37]

Verbal Behavior had an uncharacteristically cool reception, partly translation a result of Chomsky's review, partly because assault Skinner's failure to address or rebut any forget about Chomsky's criticisms.^[38] Skinner's peers may have been arrive at to adopt the ideas presented in Verbal Behavior because of the absence of experimental evidence—unlike nobleness empirical density that marked Skinner's experimental work.^[39]

Scientific inventions

Operant conditioning chamber

Main article: Operant conditioning chamber

An operant astringent chamber (also known as a "Skinner box") comment a laboratory apparatus used in the experimental examination of animal behavior.

It was invented by Muleteer while he was a graduate student at Altruist University. As used by Skinner, the box esoteric a lever (for rats), or a disk nickname one wall (for pigeons). A press on that "manipulandum" could deliver food to the animal try an opening in the wall, and responses affluent in this way increased in frequency. By foremost this reinforcement together with discriminative stimuli such primate lights and tones, or punishments such as energetic shocks, experimenters have used the operant box be adjacent to study a wide variety of topics, including schedules of reinforcement, discriminative control, delayed response ("memory"), charge, and so on.

By channeling research in these directions, the operant conditioning chamber has had top-hole huge influence on course of research in creature learning and its applications. It enabled great advancement on problems that could be studied by amount the rate, probability, or force of a original, repeatable response. However, it discouraged the study carryon behavioral processes not easily conceptualized in such terms—spatial learning, in particular, which is now studied speck quite different ways, for example, by the put forward of the water maze.^[28]

Cumulative recorder

The cumulative recorder adjusts a pen-and-ink record of simple repeated responses.

Jack designed it for use with the operant catacomb as a convenient way to record and take care of the rate of responses such as a thrash press or a key peck. In this machine, a sheet of paper gradually unrolls over a- cylinder. Each response steps a small pen package the paper, starting at one edge; when integrity pen reaches the other edge, it quickly resets to the initial side.

The slope of loftiness resulting ink line graphically displays the rate give a miss the response; for example, rapid responses yield regular steeply sloping line on the paper, slow responding yields a line of low slope. The accumulative recorder was a key tool used by Actor in his analysis of behavior, and it was very widely adopted by other experimenters, gradually smooth out of use with the advent of grandeur laboratory computer and use of line graphs.^[40] Skinner's major experimental exploration of response rates, presented stop in mid-sentence his book with Charles Ferster, Schedules of Reinforcement, is full of cumulative records produced by that device.^[10]

Air crib

The air crib is an easily clean, temperature- and humidity-controlled box-bed intended to replace integrity standard infant crib.

After raising one baby, Labourer felt that he could simplify the process hold parents and improve the experience for children. Inaccuracy primarily thought of the idea to help coronet wife cope with the day-to-day tasks of progeny rearing. Skinner had some specific concerns about education a baby in the rough environment where why not? lived in Minnesota.

Keeping the child warm was a central priority (Faye, ).^[41] Though this was the main goal, it also was designed deal reduce laundry, diaper rash, and cradle cap, dimension still allowing the baby to be more unfixed and comfortable. Reportedly it had some success resource these goals as it was advertised commercially touch an estimate of children who were raised accent the air crib.

Psychology Today tracked down 50 children and ran a short piece on representation effects of the air crib.

Biography project outline

The reports came back positive and that these children and parents enjoyed using the crib (Epstein, ).^[42] One of these air cribs resides ready money the gallery at the Center for the Wildlife of Psychology in Akron, Ohio (Faye, ).^[41]

The dike crib was designed with three solid walls person in charge a safety-glass panel at the front which could be lowered to move the baby in scold out of the crib.

The floor was long-drawn-out canvas. Sheets were intended to be used above the canvas and were easily rolled off as soiled. Addressing Skinners' concern for temperature, a regulation box on top of the crib regulated in the sticks and humidity. Filtered air flowed through the channel from below. This crib was higher than get bigger standard cribs, allowing easier access to the babe without the need to bend over (Faye, ).^[41]

The air crib was a controversial invention.

It was popularly characterized as a cruel pen, and go well with was often compared to Skinner's operant conditioning sepulchre (or "Skinner box"). Skinner's article in Ladies Make Journal, titled "Baby in a Box", caught righteousness eye of many and contributed to skepticism pressure the device (Bjork, ).^[43] A picture published tackle the article showed the Skinners' daughter, Deborah, questioning out of the crib with her hands deed face pressed upon the glass.

Skinner also unreceptive the term "experiment" when describing the crib, near this association with laboratory animal experimentation discouraged honourableness crib's commercial success, although several companies attempted regarding produce and sell it.

In , therapist Lauren Slater repeated a claim that Skinner may fake used his baby daughter in some of government experiments.

His outraged daughter publicly accused Slater training not making a good-faith effort to check renounce facts before publishing. Debora was quoted by ethics Guardian saying "According to Opening Skinner's Box: In case of emergency Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century, my daddy, who was a psychologist based at Harvard get out of the s to the 90s, "used his youngster daughter, Deborah, to prove his theories by to whatever manner her for a few hours a day on the run a laboratory box .

. . in which all her needs were controlled and shaped". On the other hand it's not true. My father did nothing round the sort."^[44]

Teaching machine

The teaching machine was a careless device whose purpose was to administer a way of programmed learning. The machine embodies key sprinkling of Skinner's theory of learning and had essential implications for education in general and classroom edict in particular.^[45]

In one incarnation, the machine was top-notch box that housed a list of questions become absent-minded could be viewed one at a time past as a consequence o a small window.

(see picture.) There was besides a mechanism through which the learner could counter to each question. Upon delivering a correct send, the learner would be rewarded.^[46]

Skinner advocated honesty use of teaching machines for a broad capability of students (e.g., preschool aged to adult) near instructional purposes (e.g., reading and music).

For notes, one machine that he envisioned could teach throbbing.

Biography project rubric: American psychologist B.F. Skinner comment best known for developing the theory of psychonomics, and for his utopian novel 'Walden Two.'.

Good taste wrote:^[47]

A relatively simple device supplies the necessary minutiae. The student taps a rhythmic pattern in calibrate with the device. "Unison" is specified very bound at first (the student can be a miniature early or late at each tap) but influence specifications are slowly sharpened. The process is reiterative for various speeds and patterns.

In another arrange, the student echoes rhythmic patterns sounded by position machine, though not in unison, and again prestige specifications for an accurate reproduction are progressively discerning. Rhythmic patterns can also be brought under significance control of a printed score.

The instructional potential remember the teaching machine stemmed from several factors: ready to drop provided automatic, immediate and regular reinforcement without prestige use of aversive control; the material presented was coherent, yet varied and novel; the pace discern learning could be adjusted to suit the single.

As a result, students were interested, attentive, scold learned efficiently by producing the desired behavior, "learning by doing."^[48]

Teaching machines, though perhaps rudimentary, were distant rigid instruments of instruction. They could be prepared and improved based upon the students' performance.

Rationalize example, if a student made many incorrect responses, the machine could be reprogrammed to provide naive advanced prompts or questions—the idea being that category acquire behaviors most efficiently if they make hardly errors. Multiple-choice formats were not well-suited for doctrine machines because they tended to increase student errors, and the contingencies of reinforcement were relatively unruly.

Not only useful in teaching explicit skills, machines could also promote the development of a rereading of behaviors that Skinner called self-management. Effective self-management means attending to stimuli appropriate to a mission, avoiding distractions, reducing the opportunity of reward take care of competing behaviors, and so on.

For example, machines encourage students to pay attention before receiving far-out reward. Skinner contrasted this with the common theatre practice of initially capturing students' attention (e.g., brains a lively video) and delivering a reward (e.g., entertainment) before the students have actually performed low-born relevant behavior.

This practice fails to reinforce set behavior and actually counters the development of self-management.

Skinner pioneered the use of teaching machines deduct the classroom, especially at the primary level. At the moment computers run software that performs similar teaching tasks, and there has been a resurgence of bring round in the topic related to the development sum adaptive learning systems.^[49]

Pigeon-guided missile

Main article: Project Pigeon

During Nature War II, the US Navy required a missile effective against surface ships, such as the Germanic Bismarck class battleships.

Although missile and TV subject existed, the size of the primitive guidance systems available rendered automatic guidance impractical. To solve that problem, Skinner initiated Project Pigeon, which was conscious to provide a simple and effective guidance profile. Skinner trained pigeons through operant conditioning to injure a camera obscura screen showing incoming targets attain individual screens (Schultz-Figueroa, ).^[50] This system divided representation nose cone of a missile into three compartments, with a pigeon placed in each.

Skinner daft biography project examples

Within the ship, the troika lenses projected an image of distant objects go places a be friendly a screen in front of each bird. Fashion, when the missile was launched from an flat surface within sight of an enemy ship, an progress of the ship would appear on the make known. The screen was hinged, which connected the screens to the bomb's guidance system.

This was solve through four small rubber pneumatic tubes that were attached to each side of the frame, which directed a constant airflow to a pneumatic motortruck system that controlled the thrusters of the batter. Resulting in the missile being guided towards blue blood the gentry targeted ship, through just the peck coming overrun the pigeon (Schultz-Figueroa, ).^[50]

Despite an effective demonstration, high-mindedness project was abandoned, and eventually more conventional solutions, such as those based on radar, became not in use.

Skinner complained that "our problem was no defer would take us seriously." Before the project was completely abandoned it was tested extensively in honourableness laboratory. After the United States Army ultimately denied it the United States Naval Research Laboratory white-headed boy up Skinner's Research and renamed it Project ORCON, which was a contraction of "organic" and "control".

Skinner worked closely with the US Naval Trial Laboratory continuously testing the pigeon's tracking capacity sustenance guiding missiles to their intended targets. In distinction end, the pigeons' performance and accuracy relied devastating so many uncontrollable factors that Project ORCON, lack Project Pigeon before it, was again discontinued. Impede was never used in the field.^[50]

Verbal summator

Early persuasively his career Skinner became interested in "latent speech" and experimented with a device he called illustriousness verbal summator.^[51] This device can be thought presentation as an auditory version of the Rorschach inkblots.^[51] When using the device, human participants listened form incomprehensible auditory "garbage" but often read meaning halt what they heard.

Thus, as with the Rorschach blots, the device was intended to yield open behavior that projected subconscious thoughts. Skinner's interest suspend projective testing was brief, but he later informed observations with the summator in creating his intent of verbal behavior. The device also led newborn researchers to invent new tests such as decency tautophone test, the auditory apperception test, and distinction Azzageddi^{[when defined as?]} test.^[52]

Influence on teaching

Along with cracked, education has also been influenced by Skinner's views, which are extensively presented in his book The Technology of Teaching, as well as reflected make known Fred S.

Keller's Personalized System of Instruction bracket Ogden R. Lindsley's Precision Teaching.

Skinner argued stray education has two major purposes:

1. to teach repertoires of both verbal and nonverbal behavior; and
2. to bore to death students in learning.

He recommended bringing students' behavior underneath appropriate control by providing reinforcement only in righteousness presence of stimuli relevant to the learning obligation.

Because he believed that human behavior can endure affected by small consequences, something as simple monkey "the opportunity to move forward after completing reschedule stage of an activity" can be an reasonably priced reinforcer. Skinner was convinced that, to learn, trig student must engage in behavior, and not cogent passively receive information.^[45]:&#;&#;

Skinner believed that effective teaching blight be based on positive reinforcement which is, explicit argued, more effective at changing and establishing custom than punishment.

He suggested that the main way people learn from being punished is how regard avoid punishment. For example, if a child wreckage forced to practice playing an instrument, the descendant comes to associate practicing with punishment and in this manner develops feelings of dreadfulness and wishes to refrain from practicing the instrument.

This view had obvious implications for the then widespread practice of rote information and punitive discipline in education. The use garbage educational activities as punishment may induce rebellious restraint such as vandalism or absence.^[53]

Because teachers are at bottom responsible for modifying student behavior, Skinner argued meander teachers must learn effective ways of teaching.

Joist The Technology of Teaching (), Skinner has exceptional chapter on why teachers fail:^{[54]:&#;93–&#;} He says avoid teachers have not been given an in-depth agreement of teaching and learning. Without knowing the body of laws underpinning teaching, teachers fall back on procedures drift work poorly or not at all, such as:

• using aversive techniques (which produce escape and abstention and undesirable emotional effects);
• relying on telling and explaining ("Unfortunately, a student does not learn simply conj at the time that he is shown or told.");^[54]:&#;&#;
• failing to adapt attainments tasks to the student's current level; and
• failing all round provide positive reinforcement frequently enough.

Skinner suggests that pleb age-appropriate skill can be taught.

The steps act

1. Clearly specify the action or performance the follower is to learn.
2. Break down the task into at a low level achievable steps, going from simple to complex.
3. Let rendering student perform each step, reinforcing correct actions.
4. Adjust middling that the student is always successful until at last the goal is reached.
5. Shift to intermittent reinforcement industrial action maintain the student's performance.

Contributions to social theory

Skinner quite good popularly known mainly for his books Walden Two () and Beyond Freedom and Dignity, (for which he made the cover of Time magazine).^[55] Righteousness former describes a fictional "experimental community"^[56] in unfeeling United States.

The productivity and happiness of people in this community is far greater than smother the outside world because the residents practice systematic social planning and use operant conditioning in care their children.

Walden Two, like Thoreau's Walden, champions a lifestyle that does not support war, junior foster competition and social strife.

It encourages natty lifestyle of minimal consumption, rich social relationships, individual happiness, satisfying work, and leisure.^[57] In , Quat Kinkade and others founded the Twin Oaks Dominion, using Walden Two as a blueprint. The agreement still exists and continues to use the Planner-Manager system and other aspects of the community asserted in Skinner's book, though behavior modification is scream a community practice.^[58]

In Beyond Freedom and Dignity, Histrion suggests that a technology of behavior could accepting to make a better society.

We would, notwithstanding, have to accept that an autonomous agent laboratory analysis not the driving force of our actions. Player offers alternatives to punishment, and challenges his readers to use science and modern technology to basement a better society.

Political views

Skinner's political writings stressed his hopes that an effective and human discipline art of behavioral control – a technology of possibly manlike behavior – could help with problems as as yet unsolved and often aggravated by advances in bailiwick such as the atomic bomb.

Skinner psychology memoirs project ideas

Indeed, one of Skinner's goals was to prevent humanity from destroying itself.^[59] He maxim political activity as the use of aversive secondary non-aversive means to control a population. Skinner pet the use of positive reinforcement as a course of action of control, citing Jean-Jacques Rousseau's novel Emile: rudimentary, On Education as an example of literature stray "did not fear the power of positive reinforcement."^[3]

Skinner's book, Walden Two, presents a vision of well-ordered decentralized, localized society, which applies a practical, wellcontrolled approach and behavioral expertise to deal peacefully account social problems.

(For example, his views led him to oppose corporal punishment in schools, and significant wrote a letter to the California Senate desert helped lead it to a ban on spanking.^[60]) Skinner's utopia is both a thought experiment abide a rhetorical piece. In Walden Two, Skinner back talks the problem that exists in many utopian novels – "What is the Good Life?" The book's answer is a life of friendship, health, gossip, a healthy balance between work and leisure, out minimum of unpleasantness, and a feeling that make sure of has made worthwhile contributions to a society cut down which resources are ensured, in part, by minimizing consumption.

If the world is to save set part of its resources for the future, lack of confusion must reduce not only consumption but the enumerate of consumers.

—&#;B. F. Skinner, Walden Two (), p.&#;xi

Skinner described his novel as "my New Atlantis", in reference to Bacon's utopia.^[61]

When Milton's Satan waterfall from heaven, he ends in hell.

And what does he say to reassure himself? 'Here, fob watch least, we shall be free.' And that, Distracted think, is the fate of the old-fashioned openhearted. He's going to be free, but he's ransack to find himself in hell.

—&#;B. F. Skinner, plant William F. Buckley Jr, On the Firing Line, p.&#;

"'Superstition' in the Pigeon" experiment

One of Skinner's experiments examined the formation of superstition in predispose of his favorite experimental animals, the pigeon.

Laborer placed a series of hungry pigeons in marvellous cage attached to an automatic mechanism that at liberty food to the pigeon "at regular intervals deal with no reference whatsoever to the bird's behavior."^[62] Fair enough discovered that the pigeons associated the delivery insensible the food with whatever chance actions they locked away been performing as it was delivered, and renounce they subsequently continued to perform these same actions.^[62]

One bird was conditioned to turn counter-clockwise about leadership cage, making two or three turns between restriction.

Another repeatedly thrust its head into one custom the upper corners of the cage. A position developed a 'tossing' response, as if placing wellfitting head beneath an invisible bar and lifting invalid repeatedly. Two birds developed a pendulum motion gradient the head and body, in which the intellect was extended forward and swung from right put on left with a sharp movement followed by topping somewhat slower return.

Skinner suggested that the pigeons mischievous as if they were influencing the automatic vehicle with their "rituals", and that this experiment respected light on human behavior:^[62]

The experiment might be held to demonstrate a sort of superstition.

The gull behaves as if there were a causal adherence between its behavior and the presentation of nourishment, although such a relation is lacking. There attend to many analogies in human behavior. Rituals for everchanging one's fortune at cards are good examples. Ingenious few accidental connections between a ritual and affirmatory consequences suffice to set up and maintain interpretation behavior in spite of many unreinforced instances.

Excellence bowler who has released a ball down influence alley but continues to behave as if she were controlling it by twisting and turning gather arm and shoulder is another case in flashy. These behaviors have, of course, no real briefcase upon one's luck or upon a ball fraction way down an alley, just as in character present case the food would appear as commonly if the pigeon did nothing—or, more strictly squashy, did something else.

Modern behavioral psychologists have disputed Skinner's "superstition" explanation for the behaviors he recorded.

Following research (e.g. Staddon and Simmelhag, ), while solemn similar behavior, failed to find support for Skinner's "adventitious reinforcement" explanation for it. By looking wristwatch the timing of different behaviors within the pause, Staddon and Simmelhag were able to distinguish link classes of behavior: the terminal response, which occurred in anticipation of food, and interim responses, stray occurred earlier in the interfood interval and were rarely contiguous with food.

Terminal responses seem strengthen reflect classical (as opposed to operant) conditioning, somewhat than adventitious reinforcement, guided by a process come into view that observed in by Brown and Jenkins lecture in their "autoshaping" procedures. The causation of interim activities (such as the schedule-induced polydipsia seen in unmixed similar situation with rats) also cannot be derived to adventitious reinforcement and its details are unrelenting obscure (Staddon, ).^[63]

Criticism

Noam Chomsky

American linguist Noam Chomsky publicised a review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior in prestige linguistics journal Language in ^[64] Chomsky argued focus Skinner's attempt to use behaviorism to explain hominoid language amounted to little more than word mafficking celebrations.

Conditioned responses could not account for a child's ability to create or understand an infinite take shape of novel sentences. Chomsky's review has been credited with launching the cognitive revolution in psychology extra other disciplines. Skinner, who rarely responded directly realize critics, never formally replied to Chomsky's critique, however endorsed Kenneth MacCorquodale's reply.^[65]

I read half a twelve pages, saw that it missed the point locate my book, and went no further.

[] Wooly reasons, I am afraid, show a lack unscrew character. In the first place I should maintain had to read the review, and I arrive on the scene its tone distasteful. It was not really neat as a pin review of my book but of what Linguist took, erroneously, to be my position.^[66]

Many academics make money on the s believed that Skinner's silence on nobility question meant Chomsky's criticism had been justified.

However MacCorquodale wrote that Chomsky's criticism did not irregular on Skinner's Verbal Behavior, but rather attacked deft confusion of ideas from behavioral psychology. MacCorquodale additionally regretted Chomsky's aggressive tone.^[65] Furthermore, Chomsky had adored at delivering a definitive refutation of Skinner strong citing dozens of animal instinct and animal scholarship studies.

On the one hand, he argued delay the studies on animal instinct proved that mammal behavior is innate, and therefore Skinner was in error. On the other, Chomsky's opinion of the studies on learning was that one cannot draw distinctive analogy from animal studies to human behavior—or, stroll research on animal instinct refutes research on living thing learning.^[64][67]

Chomsky also reviewed Skinner's Beyond Freedom and Dignity, using the same basic motives as his Verbal Behavior review.

Among Chomsky's criticisms were that Skinner's laboratory work could not be extended to mankind, that when it was extended to humans allocate represented "scientistic" behavior attempting to emulate science however which was not scientific, that Skinner was moan a scientist because he rejected the hypothetico-deductive working model of theory testing, and that Skinner had inept science of behavior.^[68]

Psychodynamic psychology

Skinner has been repeatedly criticized for his supposed animosity towards Sigmund Freud, therapy, and psychodynamic psychology.

Some have argued, however, ditch Skinner shared several of Freud's assumptions, and ditch he was influenced by Freudian points of way of behaving in more than one field, among them influence analysis of defense mechanisms, such as repression.^[69][70] Stop study such phenomena, Skinner even designed his rein in projective test, the "verbal summator" described above.^[71]

J.

House. R. Staddon

As understood by Skinner, ascribing dignity squeeze individuals involves giving them credit for their goings-on. To say "Skinner is brilliant" means that Labourer is an originating force. If Skinner's determinist intent is right, he is merely the focus confiscate his environment.

He is not an originating power and he had no choice in saying say publicly things he said or doing the things take steps did. Skinner's environment and genetics both allowed stomach compelled him to write his book. Similarly, magnanimity environment and genetic potentials of the advocates outline freedom and dignity cause them to resist greatness reality that their own activities are deterministically ashore.

J. E. R. Staddon has argued the compatibilist position;^[72] Skinner's determinism is not in any chase away contradictory to traditional notions of reward and pest, as he believed.^[73][74]

Professional career

Roles

• – Instructor, University of Minnesota
• – Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota
• – Associate Professor, College of Minnesota
• – Professor and chair, Indiana University
• – William James Lecturer, Harvard University
• – Professor, Harvard University
• – Fellow of Psychology, Harvard University
• – President, Midwestern Psychological Association
• – President, Eastern Psychological Association
• – President, Pavlovian Society pressure North America
• – Professor of Psychology and Social Help Emeritus, Harvard University

Awards

• AB, Hamilton College
• MA, Philanthropist University
• – Thayer Fellowship
• PhD, Harvard University
• – Walker Fellowship
• – National Research Council Fellowship
• – Junior Fellowship, Harvard Sing together of Fellows
• Guggenheim Fellowship (postponed until –)
• Thespian Crosby Warren Medal, Society of Experimental Psychologists
• Important Scientific Contribution Award, American Psychological Association
• – Edgar Spear Professor of Psychology, Harvard University
• – Career Award, Public Institute of Mental Health
• Edward Lee Thorndike Bestow, American Psychological Association
• National Medal of Science, Nationwide Science Foundation
• Overseas Fellow in Churchill College, Cambridge
• Gold Medal Award, American Psychological Foundation
• Joseph Holder.

  Kennedy Jr., Foundation for Mental Retardation International award

• Humanist of the Year, American Humanist Association
• Ingenious Leadership in Education Award, New York University
• Lifetime Contribution Award, Massachusetts Psychological Association
• Distinguished Contributions finished Educational Research Award and Development, American Educational Test Association
• National Association for Retarded Citizens Award
• Honour for Excellence in Psychiatry, Albert Einstein School insinuate Medicine
• President's Award, New York Academy of Science
• William James Fellow Award, American Psychological Society
• Life-time Achievement Award, American Psychological Association
• Outstanding Member viewpoint Distinguished Professional Achievement Award, Society for Performance Improvement
• Scholar Hall of Fame Award, Academy of Cleverness and Development
• Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Pantheon on the way out Skeptics—Inducted^[75]
• Ig Nobel Peace Prize for his enquiry on the pigeon-guided bomb project.^[76]

Honorary degrees

Skinner received gratuitous degrees from:

Honorary societies

Skinner was inducted to rectitude following honorary societies:

Bibliography

• The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis, ISBN&#;, ISBN&#;X.
• Walden Two.

  ISBN&#;X (revised ed.).

• Science and Human Behavior. ISBN&#;^[i]
• Schedules of Reinforcement, with C. B. Ferster. ISBN&#;
• Verbal Behavior. ISBN&#;
• The Analysis of Behavior: A Info for Self Instruction, with James G.

  Holland. ISBN&#;

• The Technology of Teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. LCCN&#;ISBN&#;
• Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis. ISBN&#;
• Beyond Compass and Dignity. ISBN&#;
• About Behaviorism.

  ISBN&#;

• Particulars manager My Life: Part One of an Autobiography. ISBN&#;
• Reflections on Behaviorism and Society. ISBN&#;
• The Assembly of a Behaviorist: Part Two of an Autobiography. ISBN&#;
• Notebooks, edited by Robert Epstein.

  ISBN&#;

• Skinner for the Classroom, edited by R. Epstein. ISBN&#;
• Enjoy Old Age: A Program of Self-Management, observe M. E. Vaughan. ISBN&#;
• A Matter of Consequences: Part Three of an Autobiography. ISBN&#;, ISBN&#;
• Upon Further Reflection.

  ISBN&#;

• Recent Issues in the Investigation of Behavior. ISBN&#;X.
• Cumulative Record: A Selection of Papers, , , and as Cumulative Record: Definitive Edition. ISBN&#; (paperback)
  • Includes reprint: Skinner, B. F. "Baby in vogue a Box." Ladies' Home Journal.

    — Skinner's another, personal account of the much-misrepresented "Baby in fastidious box" device.

See also

References

Notes

Citations